Theoretical and philosophical foundations of English language teacher education in India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33910/Keywords:
foreign language teachers, India, colonialism, positivism, utilitarianism, constructivism, social constructivism, critical pedagogy, humanism, behaviorismAbstract
Introduction. This article examines the historical development and philosophical foundations of foreign language teacher education in India. A retrospective analysis shows that this education began to take on a systemic character in the mid-20th century. During the colonial period (mid-18th century to 1947), India’s pedagogical discourse was shaped by competing paradigms rooted, on the one hand, in British colonial policy and, on the other hand, in traditional Indian educational traditions. These paradigms included positivism, utilitarianism, orientalism, occidentalism, nationalism, and anti-colonialism.
Materials and Methods. The research employs the methods of analysis and synthesis, interpreting scholarly literature and practical experience in the field. It also summarizes international best practices in foreign language teacher training.
Results. The pedagogical theories that have most strongly influenced teacher education in India include constructivism, social constructivism, critical pedagogy, humanism, behaviorism, cognitivism, and essentialism. The core disciplines in foreign language teacher training comprise applied linguistics, general linguistics, pedagogy, psychology, and related fields. While constructivism is the dominant conceptual approach in both global and Indian teacher education, its theoretical elaboration in Indian scholarship is still limited. The philosophical-epistemological framework of teacher education combines social constructivism and interpretivism, highlighting the teacher’s professional identity and its socio-cultural context of development as key categories.
Conclusions. The study highlights the need for further research into the adaptation of modern pedagogical theories to India’s educational context, taking into account its historical and cultural specificities.
References
REFERENCES
Agnihotri, R. K. (2007) Towards a pedagogical paradigm rooted in multilinguality. International Multilingual Research Journal, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313150701489689 (In English)
Anderson, J. (2020) Key concepts in ELT: Reflection. ELT Journal, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 480–483. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa039 (In English)
Avalos, B. (2011) Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 10−20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007 (In English)
Batra, P. (2012) Empoderamento dos professores entre direito à educação e mudança social [Teacher empowerment: The education entitlement-social transformation traverse]. Cadernos de Pesquisa, vol. 42, no. 147, pp. 920–949. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-15742012000300015 (In Portuguese)
Canagarajah, A .S. (1999) Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 276 p. (In English)
Cannella, G. S., Kincheloe, J. L. (2002) Kidworld: Childhood studies, global perspectives, and education. New York: Peter Lang Publ., 230 p. (In English)
Chomsky, N. (1972) Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt Brace and Jovanovich Publ., 194 p. (In English)
Dagar, V., Yadav, A. (2016) Constructivism: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Arts Social Sciences Journal, vol. 7, no. 4, article 200. (In English)
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017) Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399 (In English)
Kumar, K. (2005) Political agenda of education: A study of colonialist and nationalist ideas. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Sage Publ., 224 p. (In English)
Lantolf, J. P. (2005) Sociocultural theory and L2 learning: An exegesis. In: E. Hinkel (ed.). Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Oxfordshire: Routledge Publ., pp. 335−354. (In English)
Naik, J. P. (1982) The education commission and after. New Delhi: Allied Publ., 258 p. (In English)
Norton, B. (2005) Towards a model of critical language teacher education. Language Issues, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 12−17. (In English)
Prabhu, N. S. (1987) Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press., 156 p. (In English)
Richardson, V. (2003) Constructivist Pedagogy. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, vol. 105, no. 9, pp. 1623–1640. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9620.2003.00303.x (In English)
Salavi, P. B. (2019) Problems in Indian education: In the view of J. P. Naik regarding Gandhi. Scholarly Research Journal for Humanity Science & English Language, vol. 7, no. 34, pp. 9276−9284. (In English)
Scotland, J. (2012) Exploring the philosophical underpinnings of research: Relating ontology and epistemology to the methodology and methods of the scientific, interpretive, and critical research paradigms. English Language Teaching, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 9−16. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n9p9 (In English)
Sharma, S. K. (2024) Decolonising English studies in India. Literary Oracle, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 203−221. (In English)
Suprunova, L. L. (2009) Opyt modernizatsii obrazovaniya v Indii [The experience of modernizing education in India]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 248 p. (In Russian)
Tripathi, A. (2023) Teacher education in India (Vedic to 1947): An analysis. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, vol. 5, no. 3. [Online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i03.3762 (accessed 15.05.2024). (In English)
Viswanathan, G. (1989) Masks of conquest: Literary study and British rule in India. New York: Columbia University Press, 196 p. (In English)
Watson, J. B. (1913) Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0074428 (In English)
Zeichner, K. (2012) The turn once again toward practice-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 376−382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112445789 (In English)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Лина Эдуардовна Беловецкая (Автор)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The work is provided under the terms of the Public Offer and of Creative Commons public license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
This license permits an unlimited number of users to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use.
This license retains copyright for the authors but allows others to freely distribute, use, and adapt the work, on the mandatory condition that appropriate credit is given. Users must provide a correct link to the original publication in our journal, cite the authors' names, and indicate if any changes were made.
Copyright remains with the authors. The CC BY 4.0 license does not transfer rights to third parties but rather grants users prior permission for use, provided the attribution condition is met. Any use of the work will be governed by the terms of this license.




